[redland-dev] redland-bindings packaging
Richard Newman
r.newman at reading.ac.uk
Fri Sep 10 08:34:53 BST 2004
Wonderful! I started doing this, but got tied up in separating
redland-lib, redland-bin, redland-dev, and so on, not to mention Raptor
and Rasqal as Dave suggests. I thought I'd leave someone more
experienced in Fink packaging to do it, rather than make a bad (or
incorrect) job of things.
Please let me know if you need testing.
Regards,
-Richard
On 8 Sep 2004, at 18:13, Sébastien Pierre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working on a Fink (<http://fink.sf.net>) package for
> Redland and its bindings. It seems like the 'make install' rule
> ignores optional given prefix.
>
> For instance :
>
> >> make install prefix=/pouet
> Making install in python
> Making install in test
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> mkdir -p -- . /sw/lib/python2.3/site-packages
> /usr/bin/install -c Redland.so
> /sw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/Redland.so
>
> Where I would expect the last two lines to be:
> mkdir -p -- . /pouet/lib/python2.3/site-packages
> /usr/bin/install -c Redland.so
> /pouet/lib/python2.3/site-packages/Redland.so
>
> If somebody considers implementing this, this would ease maintenance
> of the packages. Otherwise, I can still workaround this.
>
> TIA,
>
> -- Sébastien
>
> --
> «Le soleil est Dieu»
> <http://www.type-z.org> -- Turner, avant de mourir
More information about the redland-dev
mailing list