[redland-dev] A CMake build framework for Raptor
Daniel Richard G.
oss at teragram.com
Thu Jul 5 14:56:01 EDT 2012
Hello list,
I've implemented support for building the Raptor library using the CMake
build configuration tool. This is intended not to replace the existing
GNU-Autotools-based configuration/build framework, but to provide a better
solution for building Raptor on Windows (and potentially other platforms)
than hand-maintained project files for various popular IDEs.
http://cmake.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMake
There are several reasons why I chose CMake for this:
* It can generate project/solution/workspace files for basically every
version of Visual Studio in existence, from a common set of definitions
* Likewise, it can generate project files for less-common IDEs (e.g.
CodeBlocks, Apple Xcode) and makefile-trees for NMake, Borland, MSYS...
* A friendly GUI frontend is provided on Windows, great for IDE users who
like to click on things
* CMake doesn't neglect to support Linux/Unix, of course; even black-sheep
systems like AIX are covered
* The tool is actively maintained and developed by the folks at Kitware
* The KDE folks moved whole-hog from Autotools to CMake due to its solid
support for Windows and popular IDEs, and while I certainly wouldn't
advocate a CMake-only zeitgeist, it certainly speaks to their confidence
in the tool
* Of course: CMake is free software, distributed under the three-clause BSD
license
* Teragram and I have used CMake extensively for the purpose of
facilitating Windows builds of primarily Autotools-based projects, and so
my own exerience has borne out the strengths of this approach.
That's not to say, of course, that the tool is perfect:
* The syntax and naming conventions used in the CMake scripting language
and standard modules are more in line with Windows culture than Unix
(ALL_CAPS, semicolon separators and CamelCasing are in abundance)
* Some operations, like setting predefined compiler flags, are needlessly
harder to do compared to Autoconf (where you can just e.g. assign to
CFLAGS)
* When CMake generates makefiles, they make the ones produced by Automake
look simple and elegant by comparison :> You definitely get more of an
IDE-like experience when building with these, which some folks may like,
but I don't care for at all.
Nevertheless, I consider CMake's strengths to outweigh its weaknesses. I
myself am as much an Autotools-alternative skeptic as anyone, and tend to
look leerily at all the ones that have come along---especially when I've
no choice but to deal with them (e.g. SCons in NSIS). But CMake not only
stands strong where Autotools is weak (support for non-Cygwin/MSYS Windows
environments, support for IDEs), it does so in a fully general, polished,
and consistent way. This is the one that, in my view, has risen above the
pack.
All that said, then, I'll go on to the particulars of this CMake
implementation for Raptor. (Everything is in the attached patch, against
git master.)
This turned out to be a fairly complex project, because the Raptor library
has so many features that can be enabled/disabled/configured. These are
not merely controlled by #define'ing or #undef'ing cpp symbols; object
files also need to be added or removed, as well as associated third-party
library dependencies. Plus, the library conforms to various potential
quirks in LibXML2, which need to be checked for at configure time. This
complexity may be seen mostly in the top-level CMakeLists.txt file and
src/CMakeLists.txt.
The win32_raptor_config.h header is no longer used; this is replaced by
the more general raptor_config_cmake.h.in, which CMake instantiates with
configuration-specific values much as Autoconf instantiates
raptor_config.h.in. Rather than remove the #include<win32_raptor_config.h>
directive from numerous files, however, I added an "#if 0" block to the
header to make it a no-op (to keep an already large patch from becoming
even larger).
In addition to reproducing the library build in CMake, I've also
reproduced most of the test suite. Of course, the test suite is fairly
extensive, and consists of numerous similar invocations of rapper and
rdfdiff; maintaining all of these in Automake is enough of a task already
without the extra work of maintaining it in CMake. So I opted for an
approach wherein the CMake test definitions are generated as a side effect
of the shell code that drives the tests in Automake.
The patch contains tests/*/CMakeLists.txt, of course, but it also contains
changes to the associated Makefile.am files that write out the bulk of the
CMake script to CMakeTests.txt (filename is arbitrary; "make clean"
deletes it). The intent is not full-auto generation of the CMakeLists.txt
files, but to make most of the work in maintaining them a matter of
cut-and-paste. (It wouldn't take much more to enable full-auto generation,
but I think there is value in having the maintainer at least eyeball
what's going in.)
The CMake-based test suite does have a few shortcomings compared to the
Automake-based one, and will need further refinement:
* Tests that compare output to a reference do not check for file equality
as a way of avoiding the use of rdfdiff. This is a problem because
rdfdiff currently blows up on certain inputs (e.g. test 0176 in rdfa11).
* That would be easier to resolve if it weren't for the issue of comparing
CRLF output from rapper on Windows to LF reference files. CMake has
built-in functionality to compare files, but as currently implemented, it
is basically a cross-platform cmp(1)---there's no way to see past
differences in EOL convention. I've filed a feature request on this...
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13007
...but for now, I'm using CMake's CONFIGURE_FILE() to normalize line
endings on the output files before doing the comparison.
* tests/turtle/CMakeLists.txt has yet to be written, as the exit-status
logic there is a bit more involved than the other test sections.
* There is some awkwardness on Windows, when the rapper and rdfdiff
binaries depend on third-party DLLs (e.g. LibXML2). A correctly-set PATH
allows the DLLs to be found, but Visual Studio isn't terribly
straightforward about how to set PATH when running a program, and (IIRC)
the failure mode was not even obvious to begin with. I've addressed this,
if a little ham-handedly, by enabling the test suite only when building
Raptor with a makefile tree.
Other caveats of this CMake implementation:
* This build framework is not enough to produce a Raptor DLL. There are
issues regarding DLL-export linkage of various functions in
raptor_internal.h and turtle_common.h that need addressing. I'll bring
those up here on the list once the CMake stuff is hashed out.
* Support for JSON---and more specifically, the YAJL library---is penciled
in, but not yet working or tested. (I have no experience with this
library, let alone on Windows.)
* Generation of turtle_lexer.c, turtle_parser.c and such is not implemented
at all. This can be added, but my working premise is that the CMake build
framework is meant for library users, not developers.
If you would like to kick the tires of this CMake implementation, here are
some steps to get you started:
1. Apply my patch to a copy of Raptor's git master source
2. "./autogen.sh", "./configure", "make dist"
3. Unpack the resulting dist tarball somewhere
4. Download and install the CMake tool
5. (Linux) Create a new, empty build directory, and from there, invoke
$ cmake /path/to/raptor2-dist-src
This is the equivalent of running plain "./configure", with default
values for everything. Provided that you have all the requisite
libraries installed, this should produce a makefile tree.
5. (Windows) Run the "cmake-gui" application, set the source and build
paths at the top (the latter should be a new, empty directory) and hit
Configure. Select an appropriate "generator" (this is where you choose
the specific IDE or other build system you want), then hit Finish. Allow
CMake to run the configuration checks, and if these succeed, hit
Generate. Once the generation process is finished, you may close CMake
and use the newly-generated build system.
6. If you are building with makefiles, the test suite is invoked with the
"test" target, not "check".
Questions and comments on this implementation are welcome; I'll do my best
to answer any. This framework addresses a difficulty that Teragram has had
with this library, and I hope it will do the same for others here.
--Daniel
--
Daniel Richard G. || danielg at teragram.com || Software Developer
Teragram Linguistic Technologies (a division of SAS)
http://www.teragram.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: raptor-cmake.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 197733 bytes
Desc: Patch against Raptor git master (88b308cb...)
URL: <http://lists.librdf.org/pipermail/redland-dev/attachments/20120705/5cf1f495/attachment-0001.patch>
More information about the redland-dev
mailing list