[redland-dev] redland-bindings packaging

[Richard Newman]

Wonderful! I started doing this, but got tied up in separating 
redland-lib, redland-bin, redland-dev, and so on, not to mention Raptor 
and Rasqal as Dave suggests. I thought I'd leave someone more 
experienced in Fink packaging to do it, rather than make a bad (or 
incorrect) job of things.

Please let me know if you need testing.

Regards,
-Richard

On 8 Sep 2004, at 18:13, Sébastien Pierre wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am currently working on a Fink (<http://fink.sf.net>) package for 
> Redland and its bindings. It seems like the 'make install' rule 
> ignores optional given prefix.
>
> For instance :
>
>   >> make install prefix=/pouet
>   Making install in python
>   Making install in test
>   make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
>   make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
>   make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
>   mkdir -p -- . /sw/lib/python2.3/site-packages
>   /usr/bin/install -c Redland.so 
> /sw/lib/python2.3/site-packages/Redland.so
>
> Where I would expect the last two lines to be:
>   mkdir -p -- . /pouet/lib/python2.3/site-packages
>   /usr/bin/install -c Redland.so 
> /pouet/lib/python2.3/site-packages/Redland.so
>
> If somebody considers implementing this, this would ease maintenance 
> of the packages. Otherwise, I can still workaround this.
>
> TIA,
>
>  -- Sébastien
>
> --
> «Le soleil est Dieu»
> <http://www.type-z.org>             -- Turner, avant de mourir